MWH: R&W p. 82

Electron Existence

Electrons are spinning clockwise or anti-clockwise. Perhaps the electron spirals from a place of rest to an area of activity and back again, very fast — faster than we can “see” or measure. After all, what is this “energy” that it possesses? It is coming into being and returning to the Source, all the time (Hod/reverberation/vibration) — as $e^-$ spirals out, and emerges back in the same spot. Because of the laws of G!d, blessed be the Creator of everything, there will be a need for that energy to manifest and the Lord, in His Loving Kindness, provides it.

Is it absurd to think of $e^-$ as individuating? To wonder whether it is the same $e^-$ that manifests each time? Could it be a different $e^-$ each time? How would we be able to tell? Many things, some of which we are aware of and some not, could affect this manifestation and its behaviour. If it was consciousness that could influence it, we could never know if it is or isn’t the same $e^-$.

How can we always measure this as clockwise, if it is being reborn? How does anything maintain state? There has to be some universal principle, an mysterious form that maintains the narrative, the so-called continuum which we refer to as memory — and perceive as time. This has to be embedded in the very structure of existence. This is your chord with the Creator. For your memory will (re)produce effects. This is the way in which I begin to create my own reality, participating in the creation of my own specific narrative.

$e^-$ also moves around. The sphere for the $s$ orbitals, the tears for the $p$’s, the free spirited $d$’s, and the ephemeral $d$’s that form the quantum flowerings of the universe. They are also the place where the interactions (or vibrations) begin.

The $e^-$ would spin on all the vectors available in the sphere, completely “occupying” its orbital. Why then only clockwise and anti-clockwise? Perhaps because clockwise is an expanding orbital and anti-clockwise a “shrinking” one. This might make sense if this is “appearing” and disappearing according to some “effect” that extends from a higher dimension. [I am focusing on the clockwise quality of electrons. There are other qualities that make the composite whole.]

Today we describe the behaviour of these energies as “physical laws”. What is this physical law? It is a consistent behaviour that we can describe, and predict. However, we have nothing to do with that behaviour nor its consistency. That was set in place long before we knew of our existence.

Of course, these emanations obey certain laws just like the angels. They can only manifest under specific conditions. This constraint fashions the type of entity (that we may refer to as material) that manifests. If I imagine it as being a 2 dimensional being, it can perceive only itself or its opposite — in that it is intimately connected to its complimentary opposite. An $e^-$ of spin $\theta$ would be connected intimately with one of opposite spin, $-{\theta}$. In addition, the harmonies or disharmonies of the surrounding elements will also influence its vibration, as well as that of its complimentary opposite.

Let me explain what I mean by "a spin of $\theta$ “. If $e^-$ is essentially a wave form, a ripple in a field, then it is expressed as a certain vibration. Now, all “free” electrons might have the same vibration, as far as we can tell — for there is the possibility that there is a dynamic in a dimension that we are not measuring that might express some characteristic of that vibration. However, once it interacts with any part of its environment, that vibration will be influenced. For instance, when bound to a hydrogen nucleus, or floating in an uranium f-orbital. That I refer to as a “spin of $\theta$” with $\theta$ being the angle of the “spin”.

Thus one would naturally have the $e^+$ which we would go on to label a positron (a positive electron), and the $e^0$ which has neither a negative nor a positive charge — which we call a neutron. Perhaps it does not “spin” like the electron — however they would also have the “clockwise” and “anti-clockwise” spiral of their existence, even though it might not be the same measure as the spin of the electron that we are familiar with.

“…the electron is the fundamental particle of matter and is a vortex of vacuum with a vacuum-less void at the center and it is dynamically stable…”
From Paramahamsa Tewari, who had a paper published in Physics Essays entitled “Structural Relation Between The Vacuum Space and The Electron”.

Hydrogen bonds

Let’s think of hydrogen as a single, as it only has a single electron. It is very eager and available to form relationships with other atoms, as it is missing the partner to complete its primary shell $(s)$. When it finds its mate, to form that special relationship, it gives up most of its electron (force), leaving behind a a void (or known as a “positive” charge), that can attract all sorts of negatively charged atoms (called ions) with which it might want to bond. These are known as hydrogen bonds. Carrying the idea further, we come across the fact that unless it is covalent, $H_2$ — that is, each $H$ is sharing its single $e^-$ — the attachment is unbalanced as in ${H_2}O$. and the hydrocarbon chains that form the water, the fats and oils of life. In fact, a very interesting aspect of hydrogen, is that it is a basic component of the two liquids that make up most of the form of living beings – oil and water. And these two forms, consisting of the two gases of life, carbon $C$ and oxygen $O$, are antagonistic.