[[One|Zero & One]]

Zero

From zero nothing emanates. It is the only point that is not a point. Once one emerges, then all other “numbers” can emanate from the one. Only nothing emanates from nothing. So how did something emerge from nothing? That is the deepest mystery of all.

0

→ $0$ represents the circle, the feminine. The space, or place, in which the narrative begins. For in order for anything to emerge, or to manifest, first there has to be the space for it to be received into.

→ $0$ It represents the place of no dimension. It only has position, or presence. It has not manifested, and as such represents the non-manifest, and this is the line of thought that will reveal the relationship between $0$ and $\infty$, which can only itself, be infinite, yet one. If infinity refers to the many, the concept of the infinity of infinities, the all-infinite, Ein Sof, there is only one such infinity, that is complete and perfect, needing nothing, the absolute $0$. Thus it, the $0$ point manifests in all dimensions, for every dimension has a point from which every event, object or shape is formed. However, we see it as a point that manifests in 3d.

→ $0 → 1$ || nothing → something, immediately produces 2 || something has emerged → a this and a that, because for there to be something, ‘1’, there needs to be an ability to recognise an other(ness).

→ $1$ This 1d world is known as the reptilian world, focused on a single goal – that of survival.

→ $0→1$ Nothing → something → immediately produces another $1$, which we call $2$. Now there is a this and a that, because for there to something recognisable, there needs to be another $1$ to recognise the first $1$.

→ $2$ In the binary world of $+$ and $-$, $0$ has no “effect”. It is the null hypothesis. It signifies the place before anything became anything, before the place it all emerged from, before the beginning, the “in” of “In the beginning…” This binary world is sometimes referred to as the beastly world, an essentially 2d world, a world of this and that, of light and darkness, good and evil, victim and perpetrator, with no gray areas, no connection between the one and the other. Separate forevermore.

→ $2$ In the other binary world of $*$ and $\div$, $0$ plays an important role.

→ $2$ This represents also the positive and the negative.

→ $2$ This binary world is often referred to as the world of Dissonance, a 2^D
world of this and that, of black and white, good and evil, victim and victimiser, with no greys, no connection between them, completely separate.

---

$\varnothing$ - Empty Set

#math

The first, the originating, set in set theory is defined as the null-set. The set that contains nothing! What a contradiction. And, believe me, it took many years to get there. But that is the first, the original set. It is also symbolised as or or simply (notice the similarity to (zero)).
We start in nothingness and only have $\{\}$. One could propose that the constraint, the Tzimtzum, occurred before anything (even nothing) appeared! Kabbalistically, one could say that it was the state before creation, that the empty “space” was being prepared to receive creation. Bear with me a moment as I proceed on this imaginative journey. Then the potential space emerges, or “nothing” emerged, represented by $\{\varnothing\}$. Here emerges the basic trilogy of existence, represented by the (3d) trilogy, ${op1 op2 op3}$, where $op1$ is $\{$, $op2$ is $\varnothing$, and $op3$ is $\}$. It represents nothing(ness) being constrained, limited by which we can imagine as time. Our conclusion becomes that the nothingness is constrained on either side with a beginning and an end.
The first set is defined as the set containing the empty set, as $\{\varnothing\}$, and the second set is defined as: $\text{\{ \{}\varnothing\}, \{\{\varnothing\}\} \text{ \}}$ the set containing the empty set, and the set of the set containing the empty set, and so on. We also know that the empty set is contained in every set, just as $0$ (zero) is contained in every number. Thus we contain in us, in other words, we contain a piece of infinity in all of us. we all contain a piece of nothing – a paradoxical statement in its own right.