PaRDeS Information
Term denoting simple Scriptural exegesis, and derived from the verb “pashaṭ.” “Pashaṭ” in late Biblical Hebrew, as well as in the Mishnah, means “to spread,” “to stretch out,” and is figuratively used, therefore, in the sense of giving a full and detailed explanation, since through such elucidations the contents of a given Scriptural passage are extended and amplified.
“Pashaṭ” originally had, therefore, the same meaning as “darash.” A distinction between “peshaṭ” as the literal sense of Scripture and “derash” as the interpretation and derivation from Scripture could not have been made in antiquity for the simple reason that the Tannaim believed that their Midrash was the true interpretation and that their “derash” was the actual sense of Scripture, and therefore “peshaṭ”.1 Only later, in the period of the Amoraim, when on account of the development of hermeneutic principles the interpretations of the Midrash often seemed forced and artificial, … was a distinction made between the simple literal sense, called “peshaṭ,” and the interpretation, called “derash.”
It is frequently the case, therefore, that, after a passage of Scripture has been interpreted, the question arises as to its literal meaning “peshaṭeh di-ḳera”.2 A rule, which was not universally known,3 was laid down that the literal sense must not be completely changed by the interpretation of the derash,4 although it is noteworthy that this restriction of the meaning of “peshaṭ” as contrasted with “derash” is accurately observed only in the Babylonian Talmud. In the Palestinian Talmud “peshaṭ” has kept its original meaning.5 In like manner, in the midrashim, “peshaṭ” denotes the explanation of Scripture in general, and not merely its literal meaning.6
In Kabbalah, “peshaṭ,” as the simple literal meaning, is distinguished from “remez” (mere inference), from “derush” (interpretation), and from “sod” (the esoteric force contained in the Scriptures). All four methods of hermeneutics are comprised under the name “pardes,” formed by the initials of “peshaṭ,” “remez,” “derush,” and “sod.” In relation to the study of the Talmud, “peshaṭ,” means a simple rational interpretation of that work in contrast to the subtle methods of Pilpul. The expression “pashuṭ gemara” is used also for the study of the Talmud with the commentary of Solomon Yiẓḥaḳi (Rashi) only, without the Tosafot or any later commentaries. The word “pesheṭel,” which is derived from “peshaṭ,” denotes the exact opposite of the latter, so that it is used like “ḥilluḳ,” to signify the subtle treatment of a Talmudic-rabbinic theme.
PILPUL
A method of Talmudic study. The word is derived from the verb “pilpel” (lit. “to spice,” “to season,” and in a metaphorical sense, “to dispute violently”7 or “cleverly”.8 Since by such disputation the subject is in a way spiced and seasoned, the word has come to mean penetrating investigation, disputation, and drawing of conclusions, and is used especially to designate a method of studying the Law.9
The essential characteristic of pilpul is that it leads to a clear comprehension of the subject under discussion by penetrating into its essence and by adopting clear distinctions and a strict differentiation of the concepts.
Footnotes
Footnotes
See Midrash Halakah. ↩︎
Ḥul. 6a; 'Er. 23b. ↩︎
And is synonymous with “derash,” so that in the Palestinian Talmud the verb “pashaṭ” occurs in the same sense as “darash.” Shab. xvi. 15c and B. M. ii. 8d. ↩︎
e.g., Gen. R. xvii. 3; Ex. R. xlvii. 8. ↩︎
Tosef., B. B. vii. 5. ↩︎
Ab. vi. 5; Baraita; B. B. 145b; Tem. 16a; Ket. 103b; Yer. Ter. iv. 42d). For another explanation of the word, as derived from the Hebrew “pillel,” see J. B. Lewinsohn, “Bet Yehudah,” ii. 47, Warsaw. 1878. ↩︎